<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flag This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/</link>
	<description>Harshing your mellow since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:38:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al S. E.</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Al S. E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>I am putting together a separate &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://bloggercensors.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/A&gt; on this particular topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am putting together a separate <a HREF="http://bloggercensors.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">blog</a> on this particular topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see a flagged blogs list -- never even noticed it until you pointed it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a flagged blogs list &#8212; never even noticed it until you pointed it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Jones</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>Steph - Heh, heh.  You said &quot;dickhead.&quot;

Molly - Welcome and thank you!  Of course you&#039;re right.  Google is not obligated to afford us free speech.  But in the U.S. the concept is so ingrained that people get really crabby when they think their right to voice any opinion is being abridged, even if it&#039;s by a private corporation that owns all the hardware and software and lets us use it free.  In other words, Google might find that, while they can do this if they want to, after a while they don&#039;t really want to anymore.
Well-said about the falsely democratic bullshit.

G.D. - Did you really flag my ass?  Because I see that my &quot;flag&quot; button is not lit.  After I wrote that post I flagged my own ass, and the flag button lit up and stayed lit.  I thought I was only flagging that post, but then I realized it was flagging the whole page, which was eight posts and getting longer.  So I clicked the button again to unflag my ass, and it reflected that action.

So now I think when you flag someone, they don&#039;t even know.  I probably won&#039;t know when they remove me from the Who&#039;s Who, either.  Life&#039;s a bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph &#8211; Heh, heh.  You said &#8220;dickhead.&#8221;</p>
<p>Molly &#8211; Welcome and thank you!  Of course you&#8217;re right.  Google is not obligated to afford us free speech.  But in the U.S. the concept is so ingrained that people get really crabby when they think their right to voice any opinion is being abridged, even if it&#8217;s by a private corporation that owns all the hardware and software and lets us use it free.  In other words, Google might find that, while they can do this if they want to, after a while they don&#8217;t really want to anymore.<br />
Well-said about the falsely democratic bullshit.</p>
<p>G.D. &#8211; Did you really flag my ass?  Because I see that my &#8220;flag&#8221; button is not lit.  After I wrote that post I flagged my own ass, and the flag button lit up and stayed lit.  I thought I was only flagging that post, but then I realized it was flagging the whole page, which was eight posts and getting longer.  So I clicked the button again to unflag my ass, and it reflected that action.</p>
<p>So now I think when you flag someone, they don&#8217;t even know.  I probably won&#8217;t know when they remove me from the Who&#8217;s Who, either.  Life&#8217;s a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -G.D.</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>-G.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>I just flagged your ass. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just flagged your ass. <img src='http://revision99.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>BUT, having said that, of course I agree that flagging sucks.
Objectionable content is a problem with no easy answer, and they make it sound very easy. For me, the most objectionable content in &quot;flagging&quot; is the falsely democratic tone of the explanation. They will rely on the blogging community to tell them when to crack down on us. Hmmmm...
Erin is right, you have a great blog. Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT, having said that, of course I agree that flagging sucks.<br />
Objectionable content is a problem with no easy answer, and they make it sound very easy. For me, the most objectionable content in &#8220;flagging&#8221; is the falsely democratic tone of the explanation. They will rely on the blogging community to tell them when to crack down on us. Hmmmm&#8230;<br />
Erin is right, you have a great blog. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>This blog is free. Blogger set is all up, and all we do is click on the boxes. Of course they kept control over the whole thing, like when your dad gave you the keys to the car. He didn&#039;t sign the title over to you.
The explanation of flagging refers to &quot;we&quot;, but I don&#039;t really know very much about who &quot;they&quot; are, except they refer to themselves as &quot;Google&quot;, and that&#039;s like me calling myself &quot;Teacher&quot;.  
The flag explanation talks about the blogging &quot;community&quot;, but this is a no-cost-to-us community, and that means we have no control, either, within this format. 
I have been a guest in enough situations to know that &quot;they&quot; can kick you out at any time, and you&#039;d better know where your suitcase is. (Back up anything you want to keep. Your computer may crash tomorrow. Carpe diem.)
Of course the Linux people are right, but who wants to spend the time to be independent? I&#039;d rather pay my electric bill than chop down all those trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is free. Blogger set is all up, and all we do is click on the boxes. Of course they kept control over the whole thing, like when your dad gave you the keys to the car. He didn&#8217;t sign the title over to you.<br />
The explanation of flagging refers to &#8220;we&#8221;, but I don&#8217;t really know very much about who &#8220;they&#8221; are, except they refer to themselves as &#8220;Google&#8221;, and that&#8217;s like me calling myself &#8220;Teacher&#8221;.<br />
The flag explanation talks about the blogging &#8220;community&#8221;, but this is a no-cost-to-us community, and that means we have no control, either, within this format.<br />
I have been a guest in enough situations to know that &#8220;they&#8221; can kick you out at any time, and you&#8217;d better know where your suitcase is. (Back up anything you want to keep. Your computer may crash tomorrow. Carpe diem.)<br />
Of course the Linux people are right, but who wants to spend the time to be independent? I&#8217;d rather pay my electric bill than chop down all those trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>That flag thing seems so ripe for abuse--is that really such a good idea? I guess it&#039;s supposed to like Neighborhood Watch, but what if your neighbor&#039;s a dickhead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That flag thing seems so ripe for abuse&#8211;is that really such a good idea? I guess it&#8217;s supposed to like Neighborhood Watch, but what if your neighbor&#8217;s a dickhead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Jones</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve learned always to assume that women are young.  It&#039;s not exactly flirting.  It&#039;s self-preservation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned always to assume that women are young.  It&#8217;s not exactly flirting.  It&#8217;s self-preservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kStyle</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>kStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>Why do you assume I&#039;m young?

(Yes, it&#039;s all about me today)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you assume I&#8217;m young?</p>
<p>(Yes, it&#8217;s all about me today)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Jones</title>
		<link>http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revision99.com/2005/08/19/flag-this/#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Are you threatening me, young lady?  Don&#039;t you be waving your flag in my face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you threatening me, young lady?  Don&#8217;t you be waving your flag in my face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

