It’s The Supreme Court, Stupid!

If you are a Democrat or a progressive independent voter, or a liberal of any kind, it’s time to ask yourself what that means.

Future Supreme Court

Barack Obama won the Mississippi primary today, and there will be a six week break before the next primary, a big one: Pennsylvania. Please, may Clinton and Obama cool their campaign rhetoric, especially the slurs and smears, for a while. This sniping is really getting to me, and I suspect many other voters feel the same.

The Dems are reinvigorated this season, and passions are running high. We had — what? — eight well-qualified candidates going in to this election. And a Republican party in disarray and obviously clueless as to how to run the country. How could we lose? I don’t think there’s been so much energy on the Democratic side since 1972, when George McGovern cranked up his populist anti-war campaign. All the young people woke up from their love-ins in surprise to find an old fart actually speaking the truth! You had to be there, but trust me: it was thrilling.

The passion looks different this time. I have talked to a lot of voters who are saying if their guy (or gal) doesn’t win the nomination, they are going to stay home on election day in November. Or vote for McCain. They are so powerfully invested in Obama or Clinton that if they don’t get their way, they are going to do something to give us President McCain, which will be sort of like another term of President Bush.

Naturally, no one person can actually accomplish this, and my data is admittedly anecdotal, but come on, people! I’m shocked how often I am hearing this kind of talk, and how vehemently these feelings are expressed, and how incredibly horrible it would be if enough of us carried out these threats and the Democrats failed to retake the White House this year. I don’t want anyone reading this to be offended — I don’t mean this as a personal insult, but I cannot stress enough the importance of getting a forward-thinking President in office AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

It’s the Supreme Court, Stupid!

Think about it. Presidents, congresspeople and senators can be voted out of office if they are doing stuff the voters don’t approve of. The justices are appointed for life. The court is currently teetering on the 5-4 brink of going all the way to Right-Wing World, which could have disastrous effects on reproductive rights, civil rights, freedom from religion and the balance of power in the federal government.

For most of you reading this, understand: The next President will have one, maybe two, maybe even three Supreme Court appointments. The Court can either be rebalanced through the appointment of moderate legal scholars or packed with “strict constructionists” who will always vote with the right-wing religious fundamentalists, and they will be there your whole life.

We stayed home in 2000. We said we didn’t like either candidate. Al Gore just wasn’t exciting enough. Some even said that both parties and both candidates were sides of the same coin, not enough difference to even think about. As a result we now have Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. Do you really want to take your ball and go home this November, and let McCain get the opportunity to appoint a few young, ultraconservative justices?

This is too important to mess around with. Clinton and Obama are both light years better than McCain. Either of them will be a breath of fresh air after the past eight years. They can’t both win the nomination, and they will not be on the ticket together (get over that). Even if you have come to hate your candidate’s rival, I urge you to bite the bullet and support the eventual nominee.

Please, there is too much at stake to do anything else.

Share this:

7 Replies to “It’s The Supreme Court, Stupid!”

  1. Actually, I have seen a lot of people saying/writing they’ll happily vote for either Obama or Clinton. And count me in there, too, even if I still think Edwards was better than either of them. Also, it’s not just the Supremes, it’s the whole structure and infrastructure, all of which has been gutted by this crowd. (that’s another reason I support Hill; I don’t think Obama realizes that the people in power are not in the least interested in “negotiating.”)

  2. kStyle – Do you mean “I’m with you,” or “I’m with you“?

    Narya – You’re right – there are still a lot of party loyalists and people who will support whichever candidate because they can’t stand the thought of four more years. But it seems to me that there is also an inordinate number of seemingly engaged Democratic voters who want their candidate and only their candidate and are willing to walk away from the process, or even vote Republican if they don’t get their way, and that kind of scares me because the Republicans do better when people don’t vote.

  3. Count me in as one who will vote for either Democrat. Of course! Any Democrat who runs around saying if their person’s not the nominee, they’ll vote for McCain is an embarrassment to the party. And to themselves. What a bunch of babies.

    …President McCain, which will be sort of like another term of President Bush.

    I heard Pat Buchanan say that a President McCain will be like Bush on steroids. Pat Buchanan said that!

    The Democrats better unite. Or we’re in for a whole heap of trouble.

  4. Blue Girl – Watson’s bias is 1.) Not enough people are supporting Hillary, and 2.) Not enough people are reading his blog.

    But don’t get too excited. This is what we do on the left. Dissension is built in because we tend to be idealistic. Get used to it — some will take their ball and go home if they don’t get what they want, because they firmly believe theirs is the only way, and their candidate the only one. It’s always been necessary to build a voter base large enough to win even if the fringe wanders off and votes for Ralph Nader, or just stays home and pouts self-righteously.

    I was an Edwards supporter, but I’ll stay in and vote for the eventual winner of this primary, and in this way the Democrats will win in November. Those who try to bully the (internal) opposition and those whose instinct is to walk out (or go “on strike,” sheesh) are not the voters who will help end the current national nightmare.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.